My Window Faces the South
A Review of Bill C. Malone and David Stricklin. Southern Music / American Music. Revised. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press, 2003.
by Randall J. Stephens
The American South has long had a complex musical heritage.  From the days of Scotch-Irish ballads, slave spirituals, and minstrelsy, to the more recent advent of rhythm and blues, country and western, and rock ‘n’ roll, the region has been set apart by its rich vernacular idioms.  Not surprisingly, scholarship on southern music tends to trace Dixie’s contribution from the local and regional, to the national and international.  Itinerant tune-smiths, a kind of inverted revivalist preacher, carried jazz and blues from Louisiana and Mississippi to the gritty urban North.  Similarly, country music--originally locked below the Mason-Dixon and once referred to as “hillbilly music”--slowly became popular throughout the entire U. S.  Its fan-base eventually extended to Michigan, California, Maryland, and Minnesota.  Even more important than these various migrations, southern music also crossed racial boundaries and formed new styles that combined a myriad of ethnic, racial, and religious influences.

In this revision of Southern Music / American Music (a classic study, first published in 1979) Bill Malone and David Stricklin follow the evolution of regional southern music to the national scene.  Their argument is as clear as it is provocative: the South gave rise to almost every form of popular music in America.  Wielding impressive evidence, they look at the widespread interplay of racial and ethnic forms that helped shape the contours of the region’s music.  The focus here is primarily on the folk roots of southern music and an emergent popular style.  The authors ditch the old notion that “good” music is pristine, well contained within the confines of genre, and hence “authentic.”  Instead they suggest that southern musicians always borrowed and combined styles.  For instance, both blacks and whites in the Antebellum South borrowed heavily from each others’ repertoires.  Nothing so illustrates this better than the minstrelsy music of black-face performers who adopted and skewered black folk culture.  Moreover, popular entertainers of both races performed ballads, love songs, and a variety of tunes from any number of genres.  That combination would remain basic to the southern tradition well through the twentieth century. 

Folk musicologists in the 1920s, indicate Malone and Stricklin, did much to promote the myth of isolated, homogenous folk music.  (This is a fascinating theme that Benjamin Filene has also explored in his Romancing the Folk.)  Scholars posited two general types of southern folk music: Negro spirituals and mountain ballads.  This model of oversimplified genres excluded more popular and syncretic forms.  Such elementary theories degraded blues and jazz as well as country music as inauthentic, tainted styles.  Malone and Stricklin do not withhold judgement on all stylistic borrowing.  In the case of white southerners’ coopting black jazz they lament that a black-derived folk art was hijacked by whites and moved away from its original folk moorings.  Obviously.  The all-white Original Dixieland Jazz Band was neither “original” nor “jazz.”  But as whites replicated the sounds of black ragtime and jazz, the music, through white recordings and radio play, reached greater audiences (this chain of events would repeat itself over and over in the South).  Southern music was also moving out of the South through both northern migration and the rising commercial music industry. 

Generally critical of the homogenization of American music, Malone and Striclin find rock ‘n’ roll the most powerful de-regionalizing force in American popular music.  The irony is that rock (quintessentially southern in its earliest incarnation: Buddy Holly, Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis, Little Richard...) became the agent of ultimate homogenization.  The book is updated to include latter day developments from alt-country movements, zydeco, to the funda-mentally retarded young country popular among Nascar moms and dads.  The mass marketing and melding of styles that all this bred, filtered into other genres.  Producers of white gospel music turned to rock’s mass-appeal model in an effort to make gospel more palatable to the largest possible audience, or maybe more accurately, to the lowest common denominator.  Up tempo feel-good gospel replaced the heavier, blood and iron Calvinism so basic to evangelical hymnody.  The rise of the Oak Ridge Boys, The Imperials, and any number of current CCM groups ushered in a kitsched-out, soft-rock gospel that was both overtly sentimental and incredibly soulless.  That is still surely at the heart of the music various Nash-Vegas songsters belch out.  Nevertheless, state the authors “away from the beaten jaded paths of professional entertainment, older expressions of the folk South still persist.”  Indeed, regional folk music persisted in the resurgence of folk through the urban folk scene, the revival of bluegrass music (newgrass), and the ubiquitous honky-tonk of the post-WW II years.  

More than any other scholars, Malone and Stricklin realize the powerful contribution southern music has made to American music as a whole.  Southern music may be, as they emphatically contend, the most vital element of the South’s artistic heritage.  But the authors might be guilty of overstating the case for regionalism, and, thus, neglecting the impact of other regions on the American musical landscape.  What they occasionally ignore is the extent to which northern, urban, and western forms also influenced American popular music.  Blues and jazz, not just outposts of the South in the North, developed distinctive sounds in their northern variety.  Gospel music, no less, in Chicago, Kansas City, and New York was not solely a transplanted southern phenomenon.  From the 1930s forward western swing made an indelible imprint on country music.  And soul music, as it developed in Detroit and Chicago, was no less uniquely regional as soul music in Memphis and Atlanta.  That said, Malone and Stricklin are right to stress the importance of southern folk music on the U. S. scene.  Overall, this work represents an astounding contribution to the history of popular culture and, more importantly, to the story of one region’s impact on the country as a whole.